道德的底线是人对自己欲欲望和行为的制约，一个人的道德的底线是人对自己欲望和行为的制约，一个人的欲望和行为不应去伤害其它人的利益，这个基本道德是维持社会平衡的条件。　

专制社会和人类的理想社会要求更高尚的道德，极端高尚的道德很可能会打破平等的原则，使社会失去平衡

例如有一种道德，要求人牺牲自己，毫不利己，专门利人，其结果使人之间的平衡杠杆变得非常倾斜，一部分人只能牺牲自己，专门利人，而另一部分人专门得利。因此高尚的道德很容易被政治家，统治者、宗教、和团体利用去维持不平等的体制。

最彻底的牺牲自己，毫不利己，专门利人的范例是中国的太监制度。为了消除皇帝对自己众多妻子不忠的担心，所有皇宫中的男人必须牺牲自己，割除生殖器。

中国六十年代，阶级斗争如日中天的时候，道德也走偏，走向高峰。以雷锋为标志的道德准则，要求人做驯服工具，牺牲自己，毫不利己，专门利人。

首先，毫不利己，专门利人的雷锋并不是对所有的人都如春风温暖，他对敌人是残酷无情的。因此这个雷锋对于当时沦为地富反坏右的六千万在生死线上挣扎的中国贱民，是绝对没有人性的。其次，这个牺牲自己，毫不利己，专门利人的雷锋怎么会有这么多的做好事的照片呢？ 摆出一付扶老大娘走路的姿态，让别人照相，这对于一个已经消灭了私心的人是出于什么动机呢？

学雷锋对于社会下层的人来说，是一件非常残酷的事。一个没有任何人权保障的人，如果再变成驯服工具，毫不利己，专门利人，那么就跟耕地的牛马没有区别了。其结果一个道德运动变成了愚民运动，很多工人就在学雷锋的口号下被要求不分日夜，不计报酬的工作着。而这些普通工人，就是二十四小时不睡觉地工作，累死，也不会有雷锋百分之一的幸运。

同时这个道德标准也剥夺了工人因为困难去求助领导的合理权利，我亲眼见到一个工人被干部用学习雷锋嘛，不计报酬嘛，毫不利己，专门利人嘛的官腔驳回时候，脸上的凄凉和愤懑。

被选上学雷锋标兵的工人往往都有特殊原因和背景。我在农场时，队上的学雷锋标兵总是比别人早到半小时，在队部门口扫地。他扫得很慢，一边扫一边等上班的人，并不断用眼睛偷看有无人来。这与摆出一付扶老大娘过路照相的姿态是异曲同工的事情，普通工人就是扫一夜地，也不会得到领导一句赞扬。

学雷锋标兵不存在绝对的道德意义，他的道德命运完全决定于他的领导。轰动一时的大庆活雷锋张洪池在文革后消声匿迹，就因为他在文革中军队支左时，把方向判断错了，倒向了军队和造反派。等到走资派回来重新掌门时，走资派最恨的就是这些倒戈的人，这等于自己养大的狗，反过来咬主人了。

如果说一个过高的道德会引起社会的虚伪和愚味，那么合理的道德标准应怎么定义呢？它很可能是在道德底线和高尚道德之间的某一个中间点。也就是说道德底线是必须条件，高尚道德是任选条件。而且高尚道德应是自愿，无压力，无回报的。社会没有权利用高尚道德强迫一个人牺牲自己的权利，否则它就会成为愚民和达到社会不公平的工具。

正因为这种愚民道德的虚伪，经过文化大革命烈火洗礼的中国民众，一旦从这种雷锋式的道德欺骗中醒悟的时候，他们就象一股被关闭在大闸中的洪水，从抑制人性的道德重压中突围而出，以不可阻挡的势头对道德进行全面反动。回报以这种道德名义的愚弄，他们开始与道德决裂，变成了无理想，无宗教，无道德的物质欲望至上的猛兽。

中国正是经过整整一个世纪的反复折腾，千千万万的人自愿的和不自愿地献出了生命，终于在二十世纪末，从毫不利己，专门利人，各尽所能，各取所需的理想世界跳入了一个各显神通的大贪污，包二奶，灯红酒绿，莺歌凤舞，弱肉强食的花花世界，最终踏上了反道德的不归路。

The bottom line of morality is the restriction of people's desires and behaviors. One's desires and behaviors should not hurt the interests of others. This basic morality is the condition for maintaining social balance.

Despotic societies and ideal societies of human require higher morality, and extremely noble morality is likely to break the principle of equality and throw society out of balance.

For example, there is a kind of morality that requires people to sacrifice themselves, to be utterly devoted to others. As a result, the balance lever between people becomes very inclined. Some people specialize to sacrifice and devote, while others specialize to get benefit from others. therefore, noble morality is easily used by politicians, rulers, religions, and groups to maintain an unequal system.

The most thorough sacrifice and dedicated example is the eunuch system in China. To allay the emperor's fears about the infidelity of his many wives, all the men in the palace had to sacrifice themselves and cut off their genitals.

In the sixties of China, when class struggle was at its peak, morality was also up at its peak. The moral code marked by Lei Feng requires people to be the tool of taming, sacrificing themselves, not self-interested, and specifically helping others.

First of all, Lei Feng, who has been praised as unselfish and utterly devoted to others, is not as warm as the spring breeze to all people. He is cruel and heartless to the enemy. That means this Lei Feng is absolutely nonhumanistic to the sixty million Chinese people who were declared as the enemies of the communist party and struggling to survive on the road of life and death. Secondly, how can a person calling himself unselfish, being utterly devoted to others have so many photos of doing good things? Putting out a gesture of helping the old lady to walk, let others take pictures, what is the motivation for a person who has already eliminated selfishness?

Learning from Lei Fei regarding the person in a lower level of the society is a very brutal matter. A man without any guarantee of human rights, if turning into the tame tool, has been asked unselfish, s utterly devoted to others, would be no different from the cattle and horses of the cultivated land... As a result, a moral movement became a stupefying movement. many workers were asked to work without pay, day and night, under the slogan of Lei Feng. And these ordinary workers, even working24 hours without sleep, tired to death, will not have lei Feng one percent lucky.

At the same time, this moral standard also deprives the workers of the reasonable right to seek help from the leaders because of difficulties. I saw a worker who asked a help from an officer and has been rejected by the words of learning Lei Feng, regardless of the remuneration, the face of desolation and resentment.

The worker who was chosen as a Lei Feng's pacesetter often had special backgrounds. When I was on the farm, the team's learning Lei Feng's pacesetter was always arriving half an hour earlier than others to sweep the field at the team door. He swept slowly while he was waiting for people to come, he kept peeping with his eyes to check if people saw him. This is the same thing as posing for a photo of helping an old lady to cross the road. The ordinary worker who is not a Lei Feng's pacesetter sweeps the floor overnight will not be praised by the leader.

There is no absolute moral meaning in learning Lei Feng's model. His moral destiny is completely determined by his leadership. Zhang Hongchi who has been praised living Lei Fen disappeared after the Cultural Revolution, just because he had misjudged the direction and turned to the army and the rebels in the middle of the Cultural Revolution. When the capitalists come back to regain their power, the most hated by the capitalists is these people, which is equivalent to raising their own dog, and in turn biting the master.

If a high morality can cause hypocrisy and folly of society, how should a reasonable moral standard be defined? It is likely to be some intermediate point between the moral bottom line and the noble morality. That is to say, the moral bottom line is a necessary condition, and high morality is an optional condition. And noble morality should be voluntary, stress-free, and non-reward. Society does not have the right to force a person to sacrifice his or her rights with noble morality, otherwise, it will become a tool to stupefying and lead social injustice.

It is precisely because of the hypocrisy of this ignorant morality， that the Chinese people, who have been baptized by the Cultural Revolution, once awakened from this kind of Lei Feng-style moral deception, they are like a flood that is closed in the gate, from suppressing humanity， breaking out and carry out a comprehensive reaction to morality with unstoppable momentum. Rewarding the foolishness in this moral name, they began to break with morality and became a beast with no ideals, no religion, and no moral material desire.

It is after a whole century of repeated tossing in China. Thousands of people have voluntarily and involuntarily sacrificed their lives. Finally at the end of the twentieth century, from the hypocrisy ideal world of ignorant morality， Chinese people jumped to the jungle world of fill of corruption and promiscuous, embarked on an anti-moral no return.